oh its definitely pretty capable and with the right mods and 37's it will do a lot. I'm just saying it won't be as capable as a Wrangler because the lack of a solid front axle.Supposedly they are pretty dang capable too. Especially with all the drive modes and the really trick sway bar disconnect. It's like a clutch disconnect so it can adjust itself I guess?
I crawled under my buddies bronco and was shocked how many skid plates there are. Couldn't see anywhere where a rock could hurt anything really crazy! Whole gas tank was armored, from front to about halfway back was all skid plate.
Haven't been under a Rubicon before though.
I like what they said in the video, competition is better for all of us. Because of the bronco Jeep put out the 392, and because of the bronco jeep is making the extreme recon package so you can get a jeep stock with 35’s.Nice, much better comparison.
The Jeep definitely won that one!
Personally if I had to choose between the two its a Jeep with the 392 for me!
and to be fair it's not like Litebrite's jeep is stock axles and steering components with 40's slapped on.I like the new bronco and the factory up graded models are nice but like any vehicle you will need to add after market parts if you want to do a lot of more extreme off roading seems the steering components on the ford need a major up grade to run the 40’’ tires.
That’s what I’ve been wondering, as to why they didn’t do the solid front axle in the first place.Here is another good video that pretty closely compares a stock bronco with 35’s and a rubicon with added 35’s. I haven’t watched the hole thing yet but the highly modified bronco bowing out after the first obstacle doesn’t say much for making them capable for harder stuff. I wonder if in a year or two ford switches to a sold front axle in the bronco.
That’s what I’ve been wondering, as to why they didn’t do the solid front axle in the first place.